-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Manslaughter charges at last? - Equality StreetsEquality Streets on Admission
- OK, Really, What About The Roads? on Priority
- The unbearable crassness of agreeing - Equality StreetsEquality Streets on War on Britain’s Roads
- Accidents at Traffic Lights – Lets End The Madness | StrikeEngine – Car Tuning on Four Thought – correction
- Albert Slawson on Contact and links
Meta
Illegal pollution and road closures
Like most traffic “experts” on the BBC, Prof Andrew Lewis failed to mention on the World at One (7.12.20) the role of traffic lights in producing congestion, and contributing to the premature death of 9 year-old Ella Kissi-Debrah. Will the coroner’s case review bring the government to book? Will anything change? As I wrote in 2007, traffic lights multiply emissions by a factor of up to 4. Since then I’ve discovered it is as much as 29 times.
Except for multi-lane intersections at peak times, replacing traffic lights with filter-in-turn would not only cut congestion and emissions by at least half, overnight, it would all but eliminate “accidents” and road rage, and save the public purse tens of billions annually.
It would also provide an interim compromise between people living on roads plagued by congestion and drivers frustrated by road closures.
Road pricing?
The song Taxman by George Harrison and John Lennon has the lines, “If you drive a car we’ll tax the street … If you take a walk we’ll tax your feet”.
Traffic regulation costs tens of billions a year yet fails to keep us safe. Far from solving congestion, it causes it.
Like the congestion charge, road pricing would be unfair and premature because the elegant, sustainable solution – deregulation and reform – has yet to be tried.
A £40bn hole in the Treasury? No problem. Traffic system reform can provide beneficial annual savings which would dwarf that figure.
Abusive traffic policy
Just as the exposure of abuse in the Church must bring penitence and reparation, says Stephen Cottrell, Archbishop of York, so the perpetrators of the traffic system, which causes untold injustice and harm, then blames you and me for the consequences, should own up to its abuses, make reparations to its countless victims, and resign itself to accountability and radical reform.
60mph on motorways
New 60mph limits are being imposed on stretches of the motorway network, “to cut levels of nitrogen dioxide”, says Highways England.
Highways England is the state-run agency that promoted the use of hard shoulders – at some locations, can you believe, on bends. The result was 38 avoidable deaths and life-changing trauma to others involved. (Outgoing chief, Jim O’Sullivan, is on a salary of £456,727, with 63 other taxpayer-funded HE execs on £100,000+.)
So yet another layer of control and enforcement is coming into play. The intelligent move, of course, would be to bring highway law into line with Highway Code, which tells drivers to use the inside lane except when overtaking.
Moreover, a lower limit will make many drivers use a lower gear to maintain engine revs, and do nothing to improve air quality. Also, there is likely to be more braking, pumping more brake dust into the atmosphere.
When are the perpetrators of the lethal system – and by that I mean the entire traffic control system, not just this added insult – going to be named, shamed and face corporate manslaughter charges? No doubt, never.
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 60mph on motorways, hard shoulders, Highways England, Jim O'Sullivan
Leave a comment
Totally totalitarian?
On the Today Programme, that eminent scourge of totalitarianism, former High Court Judge, Lord Sumption, challenged edicts restricting freedom of movement and assembly. If a 75 year-old chooses to see her grandchildren and risk possible infection, rather than shut herself away, the choice as to which is the lesser evil should be hers. One-size-fits-all rules that deny freedoms are not only inhumane but inefficient. Clearly his remarks apply equally to traffic policy in all its miserable manifestations.
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Equality Streets, Lord Sumption, Today Programme, traffic policy
Leave a comment
At last?
Cambridge has built a new roundabout embodying the change in hierarchy that usually happens when traffic lights are out of action. It seems to be the breakthrough I’ve been advocating for two decades. The desired shift in the balance of power in favour of the vulnerable road-user might have been achieved for less money, and nationwide, via re-education, de-regulation, roadway redesign and legal reform, but this looks to be the first decent thing Cambridge and the DfT have done since I saw the light about traffic lights in that city in 2000. My calls to abolish unequal priority have always been rejected by the DfT, but maybe they were listening all along. The fact that this story (as far as I know) didn’t make the mainstream press or the Today Programme shows the bizarrely low value placed on road safety and efficiency. Article here.
Misuse of public funds
The government announces a 2bn spend on protected cycle lanes. It claims to be treating causes not symptoms, yet is leaving the the fatal flaw at the heart of the system – priority – untreated. Promoting one mode at the expense of the general good is misguided. This is another case of misdirected public funds.
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged cycle lanes, Equality Streets, inequality, public funds, road safety
Leave a comment
50 to 60
The speed limit along motorway works is being raised from 50 to 60. They ‘needed’ a year-long study to show we can drive in a straight line at 60 in perfect safety. Policymaking in the traffic field is puerile and pernicious yet we have to pay for it.
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 50mph, 60mph, Equality Streets, Motorway speed limits
Leave a comment