Blame the children?

A half-heard news item on Today was about 11 year-olds immersed in their mobile phones being three times more likely (than 10 year-olds?) to be hit on the roads. No doubt the usual suspects will blame children’s lack of awareness. But children are not to blame. The rules of the road are to blame. They put the onus on the child to beware the motorist when it could, and in any civilised society should be the other way round. We need to change the basic rule of the road from priority to equality. “After you” instead of “Get out of my way!” As well as endangering the vulnerable road-user, the current system gives rise to expensive traffic regulation which treats the symptoms, never the root cause of our  problems on the road.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What’s weirder?

The ideas behind Equality Streets have been called “counterintuitive” (a polite word for weird?). Are equality and filter-in-turn weird, or is the traffic system – by imposing unequal rights and subverting our social nature – more than a bit weird?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

If

If I’m right: that the edifice of traffic control, based as it is on anti-social priority, is flawed and misguided; and that self-control on streets designed for equality are safer and more efficient than streets governed by priority and signals, what is the nature of the delusion that holds sway, and why does a vast state-sponsored industry uphold it? It’s akin to the power of religion in the Middle Ages. It’s no coincidence that the traffic rulebook is known in the profession as “the bible”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dead red time and space

Scenes like this are repeated ad infinitum up and down the land.001 dead red

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Social protocol trumps regulation

In his column in today’s Guardian, Oliver Burkeman discusses “norm violations”, e.g. queue jumping. It helps explain why on the roads, equality and self-control are safer and more efficient than priority and signal control. As I often say, you’d cause a riot if you jumped a cashpoint queue, yet on the road, we accept such anti-social behaviour without question. Ben Hamilton-Baillie also speaks of the social protocols that ensure we are civil to each other when we’re in a public space designed for human interaction rather than a regulated space designed for control and movement of traffic.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Hoggart on HS2

“A Commons committee says the £33bn earmarked for HS2 will be a waste of money. The transport secretary says nonsense, we must compete with other countries. I’m just back from Manchester where a fast Pendolino train arrived on time, but where connections on old, unreliable trains waited for onward journeys. We could link Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield, Hull, Sunderland and Newcastle with fast, clean, comfortable trains for a fraction of the cost of HS2, and it would do far more for the economy. But I suppose it would neither impress nor interest foreigners.” From Simon Hoggart’s week, Guardian 17 May 2013

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Congestion charging + HS2 = public waste x 2

What does HS2 have in common with the congestion charge? It will cost the earth, and it’s being imposed before traffic reform has even been tried. Cars are uniquely convenient, allowing us to visit multiple destinations at times of our choosing. They are getting greener all the time. Poynton shows that sociable design which enables low-speed filtering, cuts congestion and makes roads safe. Despite the evidence, traffic authorities continue to throw good money after bad on systems of counterproductive control, and government backs infrastructure projects that do nothing for outlying regions or the man in the street.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

On the roads, self-interest = mutual interest

In banking and consumer affairs, regulation may be necessary, because self-interest is driven by profit. On the roads, regulation is counterproductive. Why? Because self-interest = the common interest. My interest in not hitting you mirrors your interest in not hitting me. My rulebook would consist of just two rules. Drive on the left, and take it more or less in turns.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“In praise of …” Guardian on Poynton

A few years ago, the Guardian ran an editorial against me in praise of traffic lights. Are they beginning to see the light? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/09/in-praise-of-poynton-intersection

“ … the doubters have been confounded” – this links to a piece in a local paper which quotes me – presumably they took it from YouTube, inserting their own punctuation.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Minister on the road to nowhere

On 8 May 2013, before the start of a conference organised by PACTS (government road safety advisory council) for the UN’s Decade of Action, I met transport minister, Patrick McLoughlin. What did he think of Poynton? He looked blank. I briefed him, but still he looked blank. In his later “keynote” address, he blamed dangerous drivers, especially texters, as if they were exclusively responsible for “accidents”. He failed to attach any blame to the traffic control system which makes roads dangerous in the first place, and his “solutions” were all about enforcement. Not a word about traffic system reform or designing roads for safety. Depressing.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment