Sex and traffic

A study reported in The Observer measures the erotic quotient of different parts of the body. The bit that relates to relationships on the road is this from Prof Oliver Turnbull of Bangor Uni, who led the study: “… we all share the same erogenous zones, whether we are a white, middle-class woman or a gay man in a village in Africa. It suggests it is hardwired, built in, not based on cultural or life experience”. In the same way, our instinct to take it in turns based on time of arrival transcends nationhood and culture. Our problems on the road are almost exclusively down to the anti-social rule of priority, which subverts our cooperative instinct, and makes us act against our better nature. The result? Avoidable death, damage and injustice on our mismanaged roads.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Traffic regulation and zealotry

Today’s concluding Point of View by the great Roger Scruton had a bearing on the subject of relationships on the road. Apologies if I oversimplify. He spoke of shared values arising from shared experience, with families and nation states tolerating difference but sinking their differences for the common good: “We” rather than “Them and us”. Beyond the nation state, beyond common law, you get irreconcilable conflict between religionists and secularists, political entities and peoples. On the road, the conflict is between social custom and regulation. It’s sociable and decent to take it in turns, but taking it in turns is against the law (of priority). Leaving Frimley Park Hospital yesterday on foot, I needed to cross the road, and saw a line of approaching vehicles with no apparent end. So I stepped into a small gap and got hooted at, even though I was only asserting my equal right to the road space. There was a pedestrian signal 50 yards from where I wanted to cross, but why should I make a 100-yard detour as well as formally stop the traffic? The rules of the road support inequality, so I was “wrong” for claiming equality, and drivers were “right” for neglecting me and my needs. In fact it was so easy for the driver to take his foot off the throttle and accommodate my path that I hope he felt an arse. But he probably felt justified in expressing his displeasure at me flouting the rules. Of course he is less to blame than a system that contrives these conflicts in the first place. Like over-zealous sharia law, traffic regulation is intolerant. Not only does it create a divide between road-users (us) and regulators (them), it puts us at odds with each other. The vile system which outlaws the virtues that Scruton extols is supported by the law of the land.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Omnishambles

The OED defines Iannucci’s inspired word as “a situation that has been comprehensively mismanaged, characterised by a string of blunders and miscalculations”. How well it describes traffic management.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Who are they trying to kid?

The RAC Foundation has discovered that councils are making serious profits from parking enforcement, as if we didn’t already know. Claims that “parking control keeps traffic flowing and pedestrians safe” are specious. Pedestrians will never be safe as long as priority rules. And you don’t keep traffic flowing by stopping it every 40 yards at traffic lights.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Equality v priority

One day, Equality Streets or shared space will be the norm. Yet in the early 21st century, assuming people have even heard of them, they are still seen as oddball, alternative. It’s the current system of priority and signal control that should be seen as weird, outrageous, no less than a crime against humanity.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

So last century

In Victorian times, children were seen and not heard. In the 20th century, road-users were hounded and herded. In the 21st century, with a few notable exceptions such as Poynton, road-users are still hounded and herded. Even in creative Totnes, the traffic authorities lord it over the community with regulation that does expensive harm. The junction of Cistern St and the Western by-pass is a travesty of urban design. Despite progressive ideas made manifest in Poynton, and specific briefings about how things should be done, the traffic committee persists in squandering public money on additional regulation, when they should be spending it wisely on treating existing examples of dangerous road design.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

ICE on Poynton

Good piece about Poynton by the Institution of Civil Engineers here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Equality Streets coming to Totnes?

Working with Re-open Totnes.

Traders’ group in call for ‘Equality Streets’

Totnes Times Wednesday 26th June 2013

2013-06-26 Totnes Times Equality Street articleRE Open Totnes, set up to challenge the current experimental traffic order road reversal system and to explore alternative solutions to the town’s traffic concerns has held its first public traders’ meeting, attracting more than 60 traders.

A spokesman said: ‘Picture this… cars and pedestrians acting courteously exhibiting old-fashioned values of care and consideration; an enhanced streetscape with less pronounced pedestrian and motorist divisions, naturally low speeds, with planters and flowers strategically placed creating subtle cues to motorists communicating the message that this is no ‘rat-run’ but a shared journey, a shared space in every sense of the word.

‘A general atmosphere of harmony and calm springing from a sense of place and community – all roadusers fellow citizens in the same boat, or the same shared town space. Instead of traffic orders imposing regulation and enforcement, the redesigned space would produce organically low speeds, thereby reducing accidents, pedestrian and motorist stress, resulting in less congestion and a greener environment.’

Re Open Totnes says if the town becomes the home for the Equality Streets concept, that would enable this vision to flourish.

Guest speaker Martin Cassini, who was linked to the meeting via skype, gave an hour’s talk about shared space and traffic issues in general, and then took answers from the floor about Totnes .

Mr Cassini is a writer and producer who campaigns for traffic system reform. His 2008 Newsnight report, The Case against Traffic Lights, helped bring about the lights-off trial in Portishead which went permanent after journey times fell by over half with no loss of safety, despite a return from back-street rat-runs and greater numbers using the now freeflowing main route.

‘Portishead shows that self-control is over twice as efficient and at least as safe as conventional traffic control,’ said Martin.

More recently, he completed a video about the transformation of Poynton. It’s called Poynton Regenerated and is essential viewing for anyone interested in how streets designed for social interaction rather than obedience to traffic regulation not only brings peace but regeneration.

Designed by Ben Hamilton-Baillie, a leading practitioner of shared space and place-making, the Poynton scheme has been hailed by police and residents as a great success.

Through his campaign Equality Streets, Martin hopes to bring this quiet, life-enhancing revolution to towns across the UK including Totnes. Re Open Totnes said it was ‘encouraging to have someone of his calibre to show an interest not just in their campaign but in the town of Totnes itself’.

Mr Cassini had a meeting with Devon Highways in January 2009. He suggested introducing the ideas to Totnes. But he was asked to hold fire, while Devon County Council considered the matter. Nothing further happened; the county council did not pursue it. A year or two ago, out of interest, he visited Totnes. He was charmed by the heart of the town which he thought was pedestrian-friendly and worked fine.

A spokesman said: ‘There must be another progressive solution to traffic concerns rather than recycling a failed ETO from 1975 and we ask the county council to engage in this discussion as a matter of urgency.

‘The Poynton film was inspiring and shows what can be achieved on a grand scale. The group feels confident that Totnes can overcome any issues with comparatively minor, inexpensive modifications.’

The group also discussed a report by Ben Hamilton-Baillie, Totnes on the Move, which was commissioned by the county council in 2012 but shelved. It concluded that Totnes did not have a big traffic issue, and small changes could be implemented that would transform the way pedestrians and motorists viewed each other to enable them to share the town’s space more efficiently and naturally. The report used £7,000 of taxpayers’ money from the Sustainable Transport Scheme which so far has spent £250,000. The report made recommendations for the town that are proven to reduce both accidents and congestion.

The group intends to challenge why this report was not explored further and feels the experimental traffic order is premature, nonviable, and, given the increase in congestion and emissions on the perimeters of the town, feels strongly that the ETO is counterproductive. Some had witnessed vital emergency services struggling to get through the added congestion. ‘When there may be crucial seconds to save a life, how can this be permitted?’ one resident asked.

Reopen Totnes is now investigating whether air quality under the ETO is within legal limits as required by environmental law.

A spokesman said: ‘This isn’t just about trade and commerce. It’s about inclusion, equality, democracy and quality of life. Devon County Council has a duty of care.’

A decline in activity has been reported – not only by retailers. The meeting was told the Rowcroft Charity shop had seen a huge drop in stock donations, which are vital for the fundraising for their hospice care. It is causing them ‘grave concern’. The Totnes museum reported it is 40 per cent down and the community Bob the bus service is ‘adversely affected’.

Mr Cassini advised the meeting: ‘You need a dynamic councillor to stand up to officers. We can brief him or her about the action that needs to be taken to resist the reactionary onslaught of traffic officers who think they know better.

‘They are unelected, paid officials. Councillors are democratically-elected representatives. Officers cite road safety as an excuse for inaction, or for their brand of regulation. But traffic regulation does not make roads safe. It presides over a UK death and injury toll of 25,000 every year.’

He added: ‘Replace priority with equality, and watch most of your road safety and congestion problems vanish in a puff of exhaust smoke.’

Mr Cassini concluded saying: ‘We should live and let live on Equality Streets!’

He added: ‘If such an approach can work with the high mixed traffic volumes in Poynton, it can work in Totnes, with universal, lasting benefits.’

For more on Equality Streets, visit www.equalitystreets.com

The group has decided not to carry out a ‘black your windows morning’, as reported last week.

Copyright remains with the Totnes Times / Tindle Newspapers Ltd, reproduced by kind permission

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mastering traffic control

In his comment piece on Mastering the Internet through surveillance of  emails, etc. Henry Porter laments “the complacency [of] centre ground commentators … who seem happy with losing a little liberty to make the world safer. None … compared their government’s response to the loss of life from terror with its response to the vastly greater and no less ugly loss of life from gun crime”; or, I would add, its ZERO response to the vastly greater (again) loss of life from an unequal traffic control system.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Blame the children?

A half-heard news item on Today was about 11 year-olds immersed in their mobile phones being three times more likely (than 10 year-olds?) to be hit on the roads. No doubt the usual suspects will blame children’s lack of awareness. But children are not to blame. The rules of the road are to blame. They put the onus on the child to beware the motorist when it could, and in any civilised society should be the other way round. We need to change the basic rule of the road from priority to equality. “After you” instead of “Get out of my way!” As well as endangering the vulnerable road-user, the current system gives rise to expensive traffic regulation which treats the symptoms, never the root cause of our  problems on the road.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment